The Bogus Science Of COVID Vaccines, Lockdowns And Mask Mandates
The CDC recently published a paper revealing that natural immunity to COVID-19 is more helpful in keeping individuals out of the hospital. This effectively reveals the bogus science behind COVID vaccines.
Governments, schools, and the traditional media around the globe appear to be executing a U-turn on demands to regulate the COVID-19 virus.
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, New Jersey, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Oregon are just a few of the states, counties, and towns that already have declared plans to scrap their mask laws in recent days. The new laws are comparable to those being implemented in Europe, where governments such as France, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the United Kingdom are removing COVID-19 prohibitions.
The news caught many people off guard because officials had only a few weeks before given little optimism that life would revert back to usual. When New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy (D) announced on February 7 that the mask mandate would be lifted because “we have reached a point where we feel confident that we can take another step toward normalcy for our kids,” it ruffled feathers because he had previously asserted that masks for students and staff would be required “for the foreseeable future.”
According to Johns Hopkins University, cases in the Garden State hit an all-time record on January 7, and deaths peaked on January 22. While the number of illnesses and deaths has decreased, they still are greater than in previous years.
A famous mask advocate, Leana Wen, M.D., suddenly favors the removal of mask regulations in schools.
“[W]hen restrictions were put in, it was always with the understanding they would be removed as soon as they can,” she told told CNN on February 8. “Case counts are declining, also the science has changed,” she stated, noting that extending vaccine access to people as young as 5-years-olds has been a plus.
She, on the other hand, had a different opinion on December 24. People should use 3-ply surgical masks, N95, KN95, or KF94 masks, according to Wen, and the administration should require such coverings with mask orders, as per NPR.
Economists: Lockdowns Failed
Numerous governors in states with the strongest limitations are due for re-election in2022, and they may be mindful of the shifting public opinion on such limits.
Monmouth University conducted a poll on January 31 and discovered that 70% of all those surveyed concurred with the following statement: “[I]t’s time we accept that Covid is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives.”
Another factor could be fresh research showing that vaccination mandates and directives have failed to save lives.
According to a meta-analysis conducted by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, various limitations aimed at preventing COVID-19 fatalities had next to no impact and arguably did more harm by imposing “enormous economic and social costs.”
The Heartland Institute’s policy advisor Steve H. Hanke and economists Jonas Herby and Lars Jonung set out to evaluate the factual evidence on the efficacy of lockdown procedures. A lockdown is defined as a government-imposed restriction on activities, such as travel prohibitions, school and public facility shutdown, facemask regulations, and crowd control restrictions.
The Heartland Institute’s policy advisor Steve H. Hanke and economists Jonas Herby and Lars Jonung set out to evaluate the factual evidence on the efficacy of lockdown procedures. A lockdown is defined as a government-imposed restriction on activities, such as travel prohibitions, school and public facility shutdown, facemask regulations, and crowd control restrictions.
The authors went over 18,590 studies employing a “systematic search and screening” procedure to see if any “support the belief that ‘lockdowns reduce COVID-19 mortality.'” The researchers chose 24 papers and divided them into three categories: lockdown stringency indices, shelter-in-place orders, and non-pharmaceutical interventions.
“An analysis of each of these three groups supports the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality,” write the authors.
Furthermore, relative to similar virus control methods which were suggested but not imposed, severe lockdowns in Europe and the United States lowered mortality by only 0.2 percent.
“Lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument,” concludes the report.
Vaccine Mandates Under Fire
Another research discovered that natural resistance outperforms COVID-19 vaccine immunity.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a paper revealing that natural immunity to COVID-19 is 2.8 times more helpful in keeping individuals out of the hospital and 3.3 percent to 4.7 percent more successful in avoiding reinfection when contrasted to having the shots.
The study, “COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021,” was published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on January 19.
According to Joel Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and editor of the Pandemic Blunder Newsletter, the data confirms what so many people thought all throughout the pandemic.
“The refusal by U.S. government public health agencies to formally give credit to people with natural immunity obtained from prior COVID infection made no sense,” said Hirschhorn. “The only apparent motivation was to NOT give those people a way out of getting experimental COVID vaccines and to NOT give them a way out of obeying all kinds of mandates. It has nothing to do with ‘following the science.’”
Shots ‘Safest Strategy’
The researchers examined COVID-19 cases in California and New York, two states with substantial COVID death rates (one in every six COVID-19 deaths in the US), and discovered that vaccination was less efficient than natural immunity in avoiding reinfection with the virus.
Regardless of the results, the authors stress the need of receiving the injections.
“Although the epidemiology of COVID-19 might change as new variants emerge, vaccination remains the safest strategy for averting future SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, long-term sequalae, and death,” states the report.
‘Hybrid Immunity’ Slightly Better
Marty Makary, M.D., a surgeon at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, professor, and public policy researcher, stated in a Wall Street Journal column on January 26 that the report distorts its conclusions to advance the agency’s recurrent storyline.
“It based this conclusion on the finding that hybrid immunity—the combination of prior infection and vaccination—was associated with a slightly lower risk of testing positive for COVID,” wrote Makary.
“But those with hybrid immunity had a similar low rate of hospitalization (3 per 10,000) to those with natural immunity alone,” wrote Makary. “In other words, vaccinating people who had already had COVID didn’t significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization.”
“The science has always been crystal clear: natural immunity is more effective, longer-lasting, and safer than vaccine immunity,” said Hirschhorn.
- Source : GreatGameIndia
